MISREPRESENTATION CASE LAW CAN BE FUN FOR ANYONE

misrepresentation case law Can Be Fun For Anyone

misrepresentation case law Can Be Fun For Anyone

Blog Article

لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................

Delay in recording confessional statement may not be treated fatal to the case of prosecution(Murder Trial)

four.  It has been noticed by this Court that there is often a delay of sooner or later within the registration of FIR which hasn't been explained from the complainant. Moreover, there is not any eye-witness from the alleged occurrence plus the prosecution is depending on the witnesses of extra judicial confession. The evidence of extra judicial confession from the petitioners has been tendered by Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram through their statements recorded under Section 161, Cr.P.C., on 06.02.2018. Both of them namely Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram took place being the real brothers in the deceased but they didn't respond whatsoever on the confessional statements of the petitioners and calmly saw them leaving, just one after the other, without even moving an inch. They have not mentioned in their statements that the accused held some weapon when they visited them to confess their guilt about the murder of Ghulam Farid which could have precluded these witnesses from apprehending the petitioners. Their conduct does not search much inspiring or natural. The petitioner, namely, Mst. Mubeena Bibi was arrested on fourteen.02.2018 and there is no explanation concerning why her arrest was not effected after making of the alleged extra judicial confession. It has been held on a great number of instances that extra judicial confession of an accused is actually a weak style of evidence which may be manoeuvred from the prosecution in almost any case where direct connecting evidence does not occur their way. The prosecution is likewise relying on the evidence of Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal which is equally fragile, as both the witnesses Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal did not say a word as to presence of some light for the place, where they allegedly observed the petitioners with each other on a motorcycle at 4.

Section 302 on the Pakistan Penal Code addresses the grave offense of intentional murder and prescribes severe punishments to act as a deterrent and copyright the value of human life. The application of the death penalty or life imprisonment depends over the specifics of each and every case, which includes any extenuating circumstances or mitigating factors.

The court system is then tasked with interpreting the law when it really is unclear the way it relates to any given situation, usually rendering judgments based to the intent of lawmakers plus the circumstances in the case at hand. These types of decisions become a guide for future similar cases.

Reasonable grounds are offered to the record to connect the petitioner with the commission in the alleged offence. Although punishment on the alleged offence does not fall in the prohibitory clause of Section 497, Cr.P.C. yet acquired Deputy Prosecutor General apprises that another case of similar nature arising outside of FIR No. 1250/2024 dated 10.05.2024 registered under Section 489-F, PPC at Police Station Haji Pura, District Sialkot is from the credit of your petitioner as accused, therefore, case on the petitioner falls inside the exception where bail cannot be granted even inside the cases not falling within the ambit of prohibition contained in Section 497, Cr.P.C. In this regard, direction continues to be sought from the case of “Muhammad Imran versus The State and others” (PLD 2021 Supreme Court 903); relevant portion of your same is hereby reproduced:

                                                                  

The appellant should have remained vigilant and raised his challenge towards the Judgment within time. Read more

This system, for use by members of the Virginia State Bar and their designated staff, allows electronic filing of most civil cases in circuit court.

If granted absolute immunity, the parties would not only be protected from liability within the matter, but could not be answerable in any way for their actions. When the court delayed making this type of ruling, the defendants took their request to your appellate court.

The scrupulous reader might have noticed something earlier mentioned: a flaw. Past the first 7 words, the definition focuses within the intention to cause “Injury,” not the intention to cause death. The two basic elements that must be proven in order to convict a person of a crime are “

3. Rule of Legislation: The court reiterated the importance of upholding the rule of law and ensuring that all institutions function within their constitutional mandates.

What's more, it addresses the limitation period under Article 91 and 120 from the Limitation Act, focusing on when plaintiff to seek cancellation. The importance of deciding application under Order VII Rule eleven CPC based solely on plaint averments in highlighted, excluding extrinsic material at this stage. Read more

P.C. for grant website of post arrest bail should also be dismissed. Suffice is to look at that that considerations for pre- arrest and post-arrest bail are fully different. Reliance in this regard is placed on case law titled as “Shah Nawaz v. The State” 2005 SCMR 1899” wherein it has been held with the august Supreme Court of Pakistan as under:--

Report this page